Antimicrobial Potency Of Silver Nanoparticles - 1691 Words

Abstract Bacteria have long since existed alongside humans, and while some are not harmful, there are many that are. Plants are commonly used natural remedies for diseases, and have been known to retain immense antibacterial properties that can fight bacteria. Silver nanoparticles have been also known to possess antimicrobial properties that aid in the fight against various bacteria. The use of plants as well as silver nanoparticles to fight against bacteria has caused much interest in the nanotechnology and medicine fields, and has been the basis of many studies. The purpose of this paper is to scrutinize the antimicrobial potency of silver nanoparticles, and how they may be utilized to fight against various harmful bacteria. Bacteria: The Antimicrobial Potency of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles against It Bacteria are found all over the world in all types of regions and climates, and can also exist within other organisms (â€Å"Bacteria,† n.d.). Bacteria make up a large portion of the population of prokaryotic organisms that coexist with us (â€Å"Bacteria,† n.d.). As technology has evolved and our understanding of these organisms has increased, it has come to the attention of many in the scientific community that there is a significant amount of bacteria that live symbiotically within organisms such as humans (â€Å"Introduction to the Bacteria,† n.d.). As a matter of fact, human beings rely on bacteria to live. There are bacteria known as actinomycetes, that have beenShow MoreRelatedConcurrent To The Backlash Against Parabens, There Has1618 Words   |  7 Pages1800s and they are well known for their antimicrobial properties (Scher). Recently, a method to efficiently synthesize inert metal nanoparticles has allowed them to be introduced commercially. On the mar ket, more than 400 products take advantage of such nanoparticles. These nanoparticles are already integrated into the formulation of sunscreen, makeup, and skincare (Scher). Thousands of people utilize cosmetics with nanoparticles everyday. With various nanoparticle cosmetic products out on market, the

Trial of Socrates - 1059 Words

Socrates was a great philosopher of the Greek world. He was quite an atypical and distinctive person. Being different from all the other philosophers of the land, Socrates was teaching his students ideas totally out of the ordinary from what the society believed was right. As a result, he displeased many people so much that they decided to get rid of him. Socrates was put to trial, accused of spoiling the youth of Athens, tried and sentenced to death. His personal defense is described in works two of his students: Xenophon and Plato. Both of them wrote papers called Apology, which is the Greek word for â€Å"defense†. In this essay I used Apology by Plato as the main resource, since it contents a more full account of the trial of Socrates and†¦show more content†¦However, I do feel quite a bit of compassion for his accusers. Socrates was changing their sons’ minds by making them question the supremacy and intelligence of the people whose wisdom was recognized i n the state. He made young people question even the intelligence of their fathers. It should not have been easy for the fathers to stay put and listen to him philosophizing about his ideas of the world. No wonder Socrates had to beg them to listen to the end and not to interrupt at least three times throughout the Apology. Despite the fact that I do not quite approve Socrates’ attitude and the way he was defending himself, I would not be able to give him any advice on doing it differently. This man had a very insightful, logical and genuine mind. He was teaching his disciples his beliefs. It was his beliefs he spoke about in the court. In order to defend himself and make a positive impression on the jury, Socrates would have had to mask his convictions and pretend to be something he was not at all. Besides, I do not think the he would be able to apologize and promise not to challenge people on their wisdom ever again. He just would not be able to keep the promise! This was his life and Socrates was already seventy years of age – too late to change and start forming his ideas and opinions all over again. If I could speak to the famous Greek now, I would beg him not to provoke the jury and apologize to them, but there is no wayShow MoreRelatedThe Trial of Socrates1543 Words   |  7 Pages In the trial of Socrates, I juror number 307, Ryan Callahan vote the defendant is Not Guilty on the first charge of Corrupting the youth. My justifications for this vote are as follows. Socrates didn t corrupt the youth, he just shared his ideas with them and they in turn chose the path to take these ideas. Part of understanding this case is understand the time in which the case was held. This time being 399 B.C., a time in which Athens was a free democratic city, a town which prided itselfRead MoreThe Apology About The Trial Of Socrates1874 Words   |  8 PagesThe Apology was about the trial of Socrates, how he went before the jury to defend himself from the charges brought against him. Socrates was charged with impiety he does not believe in the gods whom the people believes in he is portrayed as an atheist and he speculates about the heaven and thing beneath the ground, he seeks natural explanation for astronomical and geological phenomena rather than the gods and also he corrupts the youth he infuses in them a spirit of criticism his questioning ofRead MorePlato s The Trial And Death Of Socrates Essay1671 Words   |  7 PagesPlato’s The Trial and Death of Socrates presents the reader with complex competing conceptions of what should be considered â€Å"the good life†. According to Socrates, â€Å"the most important thing is not life, but the good life† (Crito, 48b). The majority, who live a non-philosophical life, believes the goods of life include wealth, reputation, and honor: all things that can easily be taken away or destroyed. On the other hand, Socrates lives a philosophical life filled with self-sufficiency. He views wisdomRead More Essay on A Hoax in Court: The Trial of Socrates1547 Words   |  7 PagesAlbert Einstein quoted, â€Å"In matters of truth and justice, there is no difference between large and small problems, for issues concerning the treatment of people are all the same† (Brainy Quote). Were justice and truth a part of Socrates’ trial? The primary question is: what is justice? According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, the definition of justice is: â€Å"the administration of law, especially the establishment or determination of rights according to the rules of law or equity.† Meletus broughtRead MoreTrial of Socrates914 Words   |  4 PagesTrial of Socrates What do Jesus, Joan of Arc, Martin Luther King Jr., and Socrates all have in common? All of them died for their beliefs. The Trial of Socrates depicts a scene where Socrates is in prison condemned to death and he is speaking with an acquaintance Crito. Socrates is being put to death because he was charged with corrupting the youth and not acknowledging the gods. Although over the course of the trial Socrates has numerous opportunities to evade the death penalty, he doesRead MoreTrial of Socrates1073 Words   |  5 PagesSocrates was a great philosopher of the Greek world. He was quite an atypical and distinctive person. Being different from all the other philosophers of the land, Socrates was teaching his students ideas totally out of the ordinary from what the society believed was right. As a result, he displeased many people so much that they decided to get rid of him. Socrates was put to trial, accused of spoiling the youth of Athens, tried and sentenced to death. His person al defense is described in works twoRead MoreThe Trial And Death Of Socrates : The Trial And Death Of Socrates972 Words   |  4 Pages The Trial and Death of Socrates, depicts the different stages of Socrates’s life, from his prosecution until his execution. During the narratives, Socrates gives us, as readers, insight towards his beliefs and philosophy, which are viewed as reasons for his imprisonment. Phaedo’s recollection of Socrates’s last few hours alive, reveals Socrates’s most important belief, that the soul is an entity which is immortal and is valuable during and after life. All perceived lusts, greed, and fear are causedRead MoreSocrates Trial Essay662 Words   |  3 PagesSocrates Trial In 399 B.C., Socrates, a seventy year old man, was brought to trial. He faced several accusations of different sorts. Initially, the court had pronounced Socrates guilty. However, because the law had no penalty ordained for his offense, it was required of Socrates to propose his own penalty, or to take the one suggested by Meletos, the death penalty. When the time had come for Socrates to state his defense, he addressed each of the accusations made against him, one by oneRead MoreSocrates Trial Essay807 Words   |  4 PagesApology Socrates was charged and put on trial for impiety, as well as accused of committing many other crimes. I will first explain the most important issues of why Socrates was sent to death. Then I will argue the position that Socrates is innocent, and should not be have been found guilty. To introduce, Socrates was placed on trial and charged with the crime of impiety. Impiety is the lack of reverence for the gods and other sacred things. As well another major claim was that Socrates was corruptingRead MoreThe Trial And Death Of Socrates845 Words   |  4 Pagesright or not. For that, in this essay, we will use Plato’s The Trial and Death of Socrates, as our example of how this kind of attitudes play in Socrates’ life as it is well-known as intelligently and morally lived one. In Euthyphro section, Socrates meets a man named Euthyphro before his trial, where he is being accused by Meletus for corrupting the youth. While Euthyphro is here to prosecute his own father for the case of murder. Socrates starts to ask him about his meaning of piety. â€Å"It is not

Declaration of Independence DBQ free essay sample

So the fact that some of the grievances listed may be fabricated or altercate, is only natural if you want to gain allies, and make your parent country look bad. The colonists didnt want to quietly separate form the British; they wanted to make a statement. Although some of the charges leveled against the king in the Declaration arent valid, the majority of the charges, including those about trade, economics, political influence, and domestic feuding, were very much valid charges.The grievance in the Declaration of independence that specifically addresses the amerce problem wealth the colonies states that Britain cut off all trade with other parts of the world, except them. We can clearly see this statement is a valid grievance, because If we examine the numerical statistics of Imports and exports of Britain In the years of 1763-1775, we can clearly see a disturbing pattern. In Britains trade with the colonies the colonists received about % of what they exported, back in imports (Doc ument B). This unbalance is a big gap that identifies the underlying issue of monopolizing, which the British had over the colonies. The Colonists couldnt possibly have traded with any other country anyways because they had no money. The Grievance in the Declaration of independence that addresses international trade is in fact a valid grievance. The grievance In the Declaration of independence that comments on the unjust taxes that existed within the colonies, stated that Britain Imposed taxes without are consent. There were several Tax legislations that The Brothels parliament created for the colonies, without the colonies consent.Examples of these taxes Include: the Sugar Act (17641 the Currency Act (1 764), the Stamp Act (1765), the Townsend acts (1 766), and the Tea Act (1773). These Acts along with others laid the foundation for unrest and high tension within the colonies, towards Britain. Benjamin Franklin outlined the specifics of the taxation of the colonists, before the House of Commons, with his statement, An External Tax is a duty laid on the commodities imported , if the people dont like it, they can refuse it, and are not obliged to pay. But an internal tax is one forced from the people without their consent (document C).Ben Franklin being an intellectual himself could have provided an educated and relatively impartial statement. Britain mainly used internal taxes to extract wealth form the colonists, and thus seemed more unjust, as the whole process was by way of force. This created further resentment within the colonies and was a major cause of the American Revolution. The Grievance that discusses the taxation of the colonists, by the British was very much a valid Statement. Laws stated that, the House of Representatives was dissolved repeatedly for opposing ideals of the king, regarding whats best for the colonists.The Most important and influential political entity in the colonies at this time was the town meeting. At town meetings people could voice their opinions on important problems that were occurring at that moment, and the People could set up a law or act, that would provide immediate help, or relief to the problem at hand. Britain thus enacted a governmental act, that restricted the power of these meetings, and that no meeting could be conducted without the governor, which often times was a voice of the King Document D).This way the colonists couldnt pass any law without partial king consent and now law would get passed that didnt benefi t the crown. This in turn caused the colonists to be unable to defend themselves, against any immediate threat to the colonies. As a result, the grievance listed in the Declaration was a valid statement that was an important aspect of the declaration. The grievance in the Declaration of Independence concerning domestic feuding with the Indians states that the crown has, excited domestic insurrections amongst us To bring on the merciless Indian savages.This defines an important grievance that was not only outlined in the declaration of independence, but also was made a point in Thomas Pains Common Sense. The British would only aid to colonies in battles with the Indians, which they could have possibly benefited from. This meant that the British were looking to gain land, money, or both. Any other fight between the colonists and the Indians they did not see beneficial to the crown, they would let the colonists themselves deal with the problem, and thus the colonies were always in a state of fear.Britain also would instigate fights with the Indians and the colonists, so that the colonists would be even more dependent on Britain, and thus would have no reason to revolt. This point is made clear in the Buxton Boys petition to the Provincial council. Which states that, Under the mask of friendship, have procured themselves to be takes under protection of the government (English.. . And are now maintained at the public expense (Document A). The British effectively used the Indians as a weapon against the colonists. Thus putting this grievance in the Declaration is very SSH a valid action.The Declaration of Independence was created in order to establish a persuasive and convincing reason to break away from Britain. Within the Declaration is the List of grievances which specifically cite examples of the oppressive and tyrannical rule of the British. Some of these grievances arent valid statements including one specific grievance that discusses Britains role in the decimation of the colonies coasts, town, and lives of their people. However for the most part the grievances are valid statements that help outline the colonists base for starting a war.

Philosophy and Education Comparison Chart of the Philosophical Models of Education Essay Example

Philosophy and Education: Comparison Chart of the Philosophical Models of Education Essay This theory has a very clear set of procedural suggestions and specifies the actions needed (what to say, goals to have in mind, expectations, etc. ). * This theory is easily followed because it divides the procedures into time frames for the teachers (before school starts, the first days, the rest of the year, etc. ). | * This theory assumes a cause-effect relationship between its principles and student actions that are not universally true. This theory focuses more on the success and behavior of the teacher (what to do when) than on the needs of the students. | * This theory shows everything the teacher has control over, so all teachers can apply it. * Harry Wong’s theory fosters discipline and order, predictability and regularity. | * The main disadvantage to this theory is its rigidity. It doesn’t take differences, individual student needs, and unexpected events into account. * Teachers implementing this theory may struggle with adaptation to student needs and behav ior. Teaching can become a habit for the teacher, and opportunities to help each student develop their personal potential may be overlooked. | Kagan, Kyle, amp; Scott’s Win-Win Discipline| * This discipline program removes confrontational association between teachers and students. * It places students, parents, and teachers on the same side. * It provides extensive structure for implementation. | * Win-Win discipline draws too much attention to student’s misbehaviors. * This plan gives the students too much power. * It teaches discipline through internally motivated controls. * It discourages resentment. * Its results are long standing. | * It may take longer to see positive results. * This approach may be perceived as being too permissive. | Morrish’s Real Discipline| * This model demonstrates a clear understanding of human nature and how children tend to react. * This model has three clear elements – training, teaching, and managing – and this makes it easily implemented and measured by the educators. * This model is based on normative expectations and therefore stresses reaction more than initiation. | * This theory, if implemented well and accepted by the students, leads to a very functional classroom. * Children raised with this model will learn respect and responsibility. | * Real discipline could conflict with social and legal expectations i n some societies/locations. * Children may not learn the meaning and importance of complying, and this could lead to future rebellion. Children might not have the room and freedom to develop their unique nesses and creativity| Comparison and Contrast 1. The Morrish and Wong discipline models are similar to the level that they both highlight teaching children proper behavior using expected methods. One of the main differences between Real Discipline and Pragmatic Classroom is that Wong focuses more heavily on classroom application and actions (not all of which are a response to bad behavior; some just set the expectations), while Morrish focuses more specifically on methods of discipline. We will write a custom essay sample on Philosophy and Education: Comparison Chart of the Philosophical Models of Education specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Philosophy and Education: Comparison Chart of the Philosophical Models of Education specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Philosophy and Education: Comparison Chart of the Philosophical Models of Education specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Morrish, however, includes more elements taking into account the reaction and needs of the child than Wong, who focuses more on an ideal classroom setting. 2. The Win-Win model of discipline is the most positive of the three, as it leaves more room for the personal growth and positive uniqueness of each student. Rather than focusing on meeting certain norms or expectations, the win-win method focuses on helping each student reach their maximum potential and replace any negative attitudes or tendencies with positive ones. . Personal analysis: a. For average and above-average students, the win-win discipline model is the most helpful and manageable. b. For students with learning difficulties or behavioral difficulties, Wong’s pragmatic classroom and Morrish’s real discipline models may be more effective, as these students will be incapable or unwilling to respond to the win-win methods. Due to behavioral difficulties, it is essential for them to learn optimal behavior so they can function typically in the classroom. |