The Poverty of Women and the Inequality of the Welfare System Essay

The Poverty of Women and the Inequality of the Welfare System - Essay ExampleShe states that the eudaemonia system is not designed for women on womens terms, rather, she considers that it shows,This clarifies the concepts of the dualism of the welfare structure, and how it may be broken down into two subsystems, male and female. Diana Pearce points out that older women choose to bring kindly security benefit as wives rather than as individuals, due to the higher income of their husbands. If they divorced during their husbands retirement, they were more(prenominal) likely to bring inA United Nations study, released in 1985, found that women do 75 percent of the worlds work but only earn 10 percent of the worlds wealth (Kirk and Okazawa 318). After 20 years, the situation has changed. Today, more women work for an income than ever before. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, womens participation in the labor force has dramatically increased from 54 percent in 1950, with a p rojected increase to more than 70 percent in 2010. In spite of the growing number of women in the workforce, womens wages are usually pass up than mens. The question as to why, may be answered by the fact that a senile system exists which gives a false picture of the workforce. Frasers essay informs us that these patriarchal norms have influenced our welfare system too. In our welfare system, men are considered as rights-bearing beneficiaries whereas women are considered as dependent clients (Fraser, 561). Diana Pearce states that the rate of poor, women-maintained households has increased, especially if they have children. condescension the greater needs of women-maintained households, there is not enough support given from either private or public transfer. In public transfer, based on Frasers characterization of the U.S. welfare system, there are two totally different characteristics of welfare. One is unemployment and social security welfare transfer (cash), that is designed to provide benefits for right-bearers, of which women receive 38 percent of these programs. Yet more than 80 percent of those receiving Aid for Dependent Children (AFDC) are children of women-maintained households. Women also receive 60 percent of food stamps. Fraser assumes that receiving unemployment and social security compensation denotes more equality than receiving food stamps and Medicaid. This is because the latter welfare programs are considered to be family failures, generally the absence of a male breadwinner (Fraser, 563). Diana Pearce addresses the seriousness of womens poverty, and how it has been steady increasing, while Fraser argues how the welfare system is unfair to women. In order to reduce the feminization of poverty, the government needs create more jobs for women and women-maintained